Slate:
So what happens when good fortune delivers vouchers (and hence computers) into the homes of Romanian youths? Obviously a lot more time logged on to a computer—about seven hours more per week for vouchered versus unvouchered kids. Much of this computer time came at the expense of television-watching: Children in families that received a voucher spent 3.5 fewer hours in front of the tube per week. But computer use also crowded out homework (2.3 hours less per week), reading, and sleep. Less schoolwork translated into lower grades at school—vouchered kids’ GPAs were 0.36 grade points lower than their nonvouchered counterparts—and also lower aspirations for higher education. Vouchered kids were 13 percentage points less likely to report an intention to attend college. And, interestingly, vouchered students who were college-bound were not more likely to express interest in majoring in computer science.
Slate: The $100 Distraction Device
– June 5, 2008Posted in: $100 Laptop, Africa, Economics, OLPC
I’m not able to say anything specific about Ofer Malamud and Cristian Pop-Eleches’ study, but I’ve seen another very similar time tracking study in South America and it left be incredibly suspect about their methodology.
Besides, whoever said that doing homework actually gets you anywhere? I never did homework in high school, but I’ve done alright for myself. I’d be much interested in what those Romanian youths are doing with their lives 10 years from now compared to their non-computer using counterparts.